| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T298719.20200710 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 10 July 2020 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 2987/19 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 11765154.7 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G06F15/16 H04N21/2662 H04N21/24 H04N21/2385 H04L29/06 H04L12/825 H04N21/845 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | MANAGING STREAMING BANDWIDTH FOR MULTIPLE CLIENTS | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Vasona Networks | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of appeal - missing statement of grounds | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Summary of Facts and Submissions
I. The appeal is directed against the decision of the
Examining Division posted on 22 May 2019, refusing
European patent application 11765154.7.
II. The appellant filed a notice of appeal on 10 July 2019
and paid the appeal fee on the same day.
III. By communication of 14 November 2019, received by the
appellant, the Registry of the Board informed the
appellant that it appeared from the file that the
written statement of grounds of appeal had not been
filed, and that it was therefore to be expected that
the appeal would be rejected as inadmissible pursuant
to Article 108, third sentence, EPC in conjunction with
Rule 101(1) EPC. The appellant was informed that any
observations had to be filed within two months of
notification of the communication.
IV. No reply was received.
Reasons for the Decision
No written statement setting out the grounds of appeal
was filed within the time limit provided by
Article 108, third sentence, EPC in conjunction with
Rule 126(2) EPC. In addition, the notice of appeal does
not contain anything that could be regarded as a
statement of grounds pursuant to Article 108 EPC and
Rule 99(2) EPC. Therefore, the appeal has to be
rejected as inadmissible (Rule 101(1) EPC).
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.
