| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2019:T151919.20190909 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 09 September 2019 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1519/19 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 08806253.4 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G01R 29/02 G01R 13/02 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | PULSE ANALYZER | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Centre Europe B.V. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation |
||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.4.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of appeal - missing statement of grounds | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Summary of Facts and Submissions
I. On 15 February 2019, the Applicants filed a notice of appeal against the decision to refuse the patent application, which was notified on 16 December 2018. The appeal fee was paid the same day.
II. No statement setting out the grounds of appeal was filed.
III. By communication of 29 May 2019, the appellants' attention was drawn to the missing statement of grounds, and to the legal consequence that the appeal was likely to be rejected as inadmissible. Any observations would have to be filed within two months of notification of the communication.
IV. No such observations were submitted.
Reasons for the Decision
No written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was filed within the time limit of Article 108, third sentence, EPC in conjunction with Rules 99 (2) and 126(2) EPC. Therefore, the appeal is rejected as inadmissible (Rule 101(1) EPC).
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.
