| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2019:T165017.20190408 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 08 April 2019 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1650/17 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 10765412.1 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C11D 3/37 C11D 17/00 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | LAUNDRY COMPOSITIONS | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Unilever PLC, A Company Registered in England and Wales under Company no. 41424 Unilever N.V. |
||||||||
| Opponent name: | The Procter & Gamble Company | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.06 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of appeal - missing statement of grounds | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Summary of Facts and Submissions
I. The appeal from the opponent (hereinafter the "appellant") is directed against the decision of the Opposition Division of 12 May 2017, posted on the same day.
II. The appellant paid the appeal fee on 21 July 2017 and filed a notice of appeal on 24 July 2017.
III. By communication of 16 January 2019, received by the appellant, the Registry of the Board informed the appellant that it appeared from the file that the written statement of grounds of appeal had not been filed and that it was therefore to be expected that the appeal would be rejected as inadmissible pursuant to Article 108, third sentence, EPC in conjunction with Rule 101(1) EPC.
IV. The appellant was informed that any observations had to be filed within two months of notification of the communication.
V. No reply was received.
Reasons for the Decision
No written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was filed within the time limit provided by Article 108, third sentence, EPC in conjunction with Rule 126(2) EPC.
In addition, neither the notice of appeal nor any other document filed contains anything that could be regarded as a statement of grounds pursuant to Article 108 EPC and Rule 99(2) EPC.
Therefore, the appeal has to be rejected as inadmissible (Rule 101(1) EPC).
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.
