| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T185512.20130222 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 22 February 2013 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1855/12 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 06719627.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G06Q 10/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Registration and maintenance of address data for each service point in a territory | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Missing statement of grounds of appeal | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Summary of Facts and Submissions
I. The appellant contests the decision of the examining division of the European Patent Office dated 27 February 2012 refusing European patent application No. 06719627.9.
The appellant filed a notice of appeal on 8 May 2012 and paid the appeal fee on the same day.
A written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was not filed within the four-month time limit provided for in Article 108 EPC. Nor did the notice of appeal contain anything that might be considered as such a statement.
II. In a communication dated 28 August 2012, the Board informed the appellant that no statement setting out the grounds of appeal had been received and that the appeal could be expected to be rejected as inadmissible. The appellant was informed that any observations should be filed within two months.
III. The appellant filed no observations in response to said communication.
Reasons for the Decision
As no written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was filed within the time limit provided for in Article 108 EPC, the appeal is inadmissible pursuant to Rule 101(1) EPC.
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.
