T 2086/08 () of 15.5.2009

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T208608.20090515
Date of decision: 15 May 2009
Case number: T 2086/08
Application number: 04251880.3
IPC class: G01R 33/3873
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: D
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 15 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Passive shimming of an MRI magnet
Applicant name: GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company LLC
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.4.01
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention Art 108
European Patent Convention R 101(1)
Keywords: Missing statement of grounds
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
-

Summary of Facts and Submissions

I. The appellant contests the decision of the Examining Division dated 11 April 2008 refusing European patent application No. 04 251 880.3.

II. The appellant filed a notice of appeal received on 17 June 2008 and paid the appeal fee on the same day. No statement of grounds of appeal was received.

III. In a communication dated 14 November 2008 sent by registered post with advice of delivery, the board informed the appellant that no statement of grounds of appeal had been received and that it was to be expected that the appeal would be rejected as inadmissible. The appellant was informed that any observations should be filed within two months.

IV. No observations were filed.

Reasons for the Decision

1. Article 108 EPC requires that a statement setting out the grounds of appeal shall be filed within four months of notification of the decision. Pursuant to Rule 101(1) EPC the appeal shall be rejected as inadmissible if it does not comply with Article 108 EPC.

2. In the present case no document was filed by the appellant which could be regarded as a statement setting out the grounds of appeal. Consequently the appeal has to be rejected as inadmissible.

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.

Quick Navigation