| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2008:T146307.20080303 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 03 March 2008 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1463/07 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 96907959.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G01N 23/083 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | A method and an apparatus for analysing a material | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | TECHNOLOGICAL RESOURCES PTY. LTD. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.4.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | - | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Summary of Facts and Submissions
I. The appellant contests the decision of the examining division of the European Patent Office dated 20 March 2007 refusing European patent application No. 96907959.9.
The appellant filed a notice of appeal on 16 May 2007 and paid the appeal fee on the same day.
The notice of appeal contains a request for oral proceedings.
A written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was not filed within the four-month time limit provided for in Article 108 EPC. Nor did the notice of appeal contain anything that might be considered as such statement.
II. In a communication dated 7 September 2007, the Board informed the appellant that no statement setting out the grounds of appeal had been received and that the appeal could be expected to be rejected as inadmissible. The appellant was informed that any observations should be filed within two months.
III. The appellant filed no observations in response to said communication.
In a letter dated 21 February 2008 the appellant withdrew the request for oral proceedings.
Reasons for the Decision
As no written statement setting out the grounds of appeal was filed within the time limit provided for in Article 108 EPC, the appeal is inadmissible pursuant to Rule 101(1) EPC.
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.
