European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T029402.20020806 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 06 August 2002 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0294/02 | ||||||||
Application number: | 95115267.7 | ||||||||
IPC class: | - | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | D | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Address translation device | ||||||||
Applicant name: | KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.5.01 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Missing statement of grounds | ||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Summary of Facts and Submissions
I. The appeal contests the decision of the Examining Division of the European Patent Office dated 3. April 2001 refusing the European patent application No. 95 115 267.7. The decision was dispatched by registered letter with advice of delivery on 3. April 2001. The applicant filed a notice of appeal by a letter received on 13 June 2001 and paid the fee for appeal on the same date. No statement of grounds was filed.
II. By a communication dated 16 April 2002 and sent by registered post, the Registry of the Board informed the appellant that no statement of grounds has been filed and that the appeal could be expected to be rejected as inadmissible. The appellant was invited to file observations within two months.
III. The appellant filed no observations in response to said communication.
IV. By letter dated 19 July 2002, the appellant withdrew the auxiliary request for oral proceedings.
Reasons for the Decision
As no written statement setting out the grounds of appeal has been filed within the time limit provided by Article 108 EPC in conjunction with Rule 78(2) EPC, the appeal has to be rejected as inadmissible (Rule 65(1) EPC).
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.