T 0485/01 (Stress proteins/WHITEHEAD) of 30.11.2001

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2001:T048501.20011130
Date of decision: 30 November 2001
Case number: T 0485/01
Application number: 89907594.9
IPC class: A61K 38/00
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: D
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 14 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Stress proteins and uses therefor
Applicant name: WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, et al
Opponent name: IAF Bio Vac Inc.
ANTIGENICS LLC
Board: 3.3.04
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 108
European Patent Convention 1973 R 65(1)
Keywords: Missing statements of grounds
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
-

Summary of Facts and Submissions

I. The appeal contests the decision of the Opposition Division of the European Patent Office dated 1 March 2001 revoking the European patent No. 0 419 569.

The Appellant (patent proprietor) filed a notice of appeal by letter dated 1 May 2001 and paid the fee for appeal on the same date.

No statement setting out the grounds of appeal was filed, and the notice of appeal contains nothing that could be regarded as a statement setting out the grounds of appeal pursuant to Article 108 EPC.

II. By a communication dated 29 August 2001, the Registry of the Board informed the Appellant that no statement setting out the grounds of appeal has been filed and that the appeal could be expected to be rejected as inadmissible. The Appellant was invited to file observations within two months.

Attention was also drawn to Article 122 EPC.

III. No answer has been given to the Registry's communication.

Reasons for the Decision

As no written statement setting out the grounds of appeal has been filed, the appeal has to be rejected as inadmissible, Rule 65(1) EPC in conjunction with Article 108 EPC.

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.

Quick Navigation