| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2001:T010701.20010713 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 13 July 2001 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0107/01 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 87307360.5 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G03G 9/08 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Resin compositions for electrophotographic toners | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | MITSUI TOATSU CHEMICALS, Inc. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | (01) Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd. (02) Manfred Kirchhoff technische Beratung |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.4.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Missing statement of grounds | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Summary of Facts and Submissions
I. The appeal contests the decision of the Opposition Division of the European Patent Office posted on 14. November 2000, rejecting the opposition filed against European patent No. 0 298 173 pursuant to Article 102(2) EPC.
The Appellant (Opponent 01) filed a notice of appeal on 24. January 2001 and paid the fee for appeal on the same date.
No Statement of Grounds was filed. The notice of appeal contains nothing that could be regarded as a statement of grounds pursuant to Article 108 EPC.
II. By a communication dated 23 April 2001, sent by registered letter with advice of delivery, the Registry of the Board informed the Appellant that no Statement of Grounds had been filed and that the appeal could be expected to be rejected as inadmissible. The Appellant was invited to file observations within two months.
III. No answer has been given within the given time limit to the Registry's communication.
Reasons for the Decision
As no written statement setting out the grounds of appeal has been filed, the appeal has to be rejected as inadmissible (Article 108 EPC in conjunction with Rule 65(1) EPC).
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.
